Hello, TNR? Here’s an F.Y.I. on the Bradley IFV and HUMVEE for The New Republic. I hope it helps!

H/T to Michelle Malkin.

Bob Owens at Confederate Yankee uncovered TNR’s unnamed expert at BAE Systems on the Bradley IFV to get the true scoop on their agility for running down dogs in the streets of Iraq.

Bob, I received your earlier email and wanted to talk to some others about the specific questions you asked. To answer your last question first, yes, I did talk to a young researcher with TNR who only asked general questions about “whether a Bradley could drive through a wall” and “if it was possible for a dog to get caught in the tracks” and general questions about vehicle specifications…

…I can’t pretend to know what may or may not have happened in Iraq but the impression the writer leaves is that a “driver” can go on joy rides with a 35 ton vehicle at will. The vehicle has a crew and a commander of the vehicle who is in charge. In order for the scenario described to have taken place, there would have to have been collaboration by the entire crew.

The driver’s vision, even if sitting in an open hatch is severely restricted along the sides. He sits forward on the left side of the vehicle. His vision is significantly impaired along the right side of the vehicle which makes the account to “suddenly swerve to the right” and actually catch an animal suspect. If you were to attempt the same feat in your car, it would be very difficult and you have the benefit of side mirrors.

Anyone familiar with tracked vehicles knows that turning sharply requires the road wheels on the side of the turn to either stop or reverse as the road wheels on the opposite side accelerates. What may not be obvious is that the track once on the ground, doesn’t move. The road wheels roll across it but the track itself is stationary until it is pushed forward by the road wheels.

The width of the track makes it highly unlikely that running over a dog would leave two intact parts. One half of the dog would have to be completely crushed.

It also seems suspicious that a driver could go on repeated joy rides or purposefully run into things. Less a risk to the track though that is certainly possible but there is sensitive equipment on the top of the vehicle, antennas, sights, TOW missile launcher, commander and if it was a newer vehicle, the commander’s independent viewer, not to mention the main gun. Strange things are known to happen in a combat environment but I can’t imagine that the vehicle commander or the unit commander would tolerate repeated misuse of the vehicle, especially any action that could damage its ability to engage.   more…

Just so you understand what Doug Coffey with BAE is referencing, here are images to look at too:

    

I am still trying to figure out why TNR would not reveal Doug Coffey as a source before.  It makes no sense to conceal his identity, that is, until you hear the ambiguous questions they asked, so they could twist it to fit what they needed for a spin on their “fact-checking”.  As Ann Althouse says, “TNR’s silence is deathly.”

Matt Sanchez interviews a squad leader in the field, personally, to find out the likelihood of someone being able to maneuver a HUMVEE or Bradley IFV into dogs, with video of the interview, no less.  Unlike Scottie Beauchamp, this gentleman actually has credibility with what he is saying, because he drives these things in Iraq.  Imagine Matt’s nerve, getting someone who knows what they are talking about and documenting his “fact-checking”!  The nerve!

And, just so you have a frame of reference on the HUMVEE…

Military HUMVEE

Are you taking notes, TNR?  Oh!  Sorry.  I forgot that you are on vacation. 

I wish they were back to get pointers on how to rigorously fact-check information on the news stuff they print.

The Associated Press finally weighs in on the Scott Beauchamp saga, a day late and a dollar short. 

A magazine gets a hot story straight from a soldier in Iraq and publishes his writing, complete with gory details, under a pseudonym. The stories are chilling: An Iraqi boy befriends American troops and later has his tongue cut out by insurgents. Soldiers mock a disfigured woman sitting near them in a dining hall. As a diversion, soldiers run over dogs with armored personnel carriers. Compelling stuff, and, according to the Army, not true.   more… 

Strangely enough, it is now starting to generate a buzz outside of the blogosphere with the AP article.  But, it seems sort of hypocritical for the AP to be casting stones on TNR, considering their own history.

My previous postings on Scott Thomas Beauchamp (a.k.a. Baghdad Diarist), the author of Shock Troops, are here, here, here, here and…*whew*here

There are also some articles I have also somewhat related to Scottie here, here and here.

Others posting on this topic:  Bill’s Bites / Wonkette / Instapundit /

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Hello, TNR? Here’s an F.Y.I. on the Bradley IFV and HUMVEE for The New Republic. I hope it helps!”

  1. Guy Montag Says:

    EVERYTHING from “Shock Troops”, published in The New Republic (TNR) is a UCMJ violation under 934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE. Why is Franklin Foer shielding war criminals, if he really believes the story as strongly as he says?

    If you were submitting articles that were generally okay and then dropped a story on your editor where you participated in crimes and then your editor confirmed with your conspirators that, indeed, they helped you commit crimes, wouldn’t the editor be morally obligated to forward the evidence to the proper authorities? Wouldn’t it be silly of an editor to demand the authorities fork over their investigative documents to him so reporters could write another story about the investigation?

    That is the latest that Mr. Foer is demanding.

    The fairbanksing gets deeper and deeper.

  2. How to dupe The New Republic… « Volunteer Opinion Journal Says:

    […] prior posts on Scott Thomas Beauchamp are here, here, here, here, here and […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: